Li Tu vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tu vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Li Tu

AUS

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

334

C. Rank

151

160

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$384.8K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

334

C. Rank

151

160

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$384.8K

Career Money

$539.0K

Plays

Head-to-head: Tu 2 - 1 Wong

They have played 6 sets in total, with Li Tu winning 4 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2. The last match between Li Tu and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokohama Challenger, 22-11-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Li Tu getting the victory 6-0 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tu	2
Wong	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(QF) Yokohama Challenger(11-22-24)

Stats

Li Tu

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

(QF) Lincoln Challenger(08-09-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Li Tu

(SF) Lexington Challenger(08-03-24)

Stats

Li Tu

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

L. Tu vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

L. Tu	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$384,840	Career Prize Money	$538,970
60.41% (206-135)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
2	Hard	1
10	Titles	2
2	Total H2H Matches	1
25.00% (1-3)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

L. Tu vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li Tu has won 48.66% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li Tu, in recent form, has won 44.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 45.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.05% and 23.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Li Tu has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Li Tu has won 42.50% of matches played (W/L 17/23), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Li Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 143/85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 20/17). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Li Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.10% of matches (W/L 8/13), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Li Tu winning 2 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Li Tu winning 4 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2.
The last match between Li Tu and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokohama Challenger, 22-11-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Li Tu getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:15.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li Tu has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.8 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.39.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li Tu has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Li Tu has converted 23.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 34.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Li Tu vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Tu vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Tu	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
2	H2H Matches Won	1
4	Sets Won	2
30	Games Won	22
10	Aces (Total)	8
2	Total Double Faults	4
1:8:15	Average Match Time	1:8:15
61% (81/133)	1st Serve %	65% (118/181)
70% (57/81)	1st Serve Win %	60% (71/118)
58% (30/52)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (27/63)
65% (11/17)	Break Pts Won %	55% (6/11)
46% (83/181)	Return Points Win %	35% (46/133)
67% (2/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	33% (1/3)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Tu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Playford Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Jason Murray KublerJ. Murray	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Brisbane 3 Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Bernard TomicB. Tomic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati - 04-08-2025
Q3 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Q1 James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	W	7-6(4) 6-4	Stats
National Bank Open - Toronto - 28-07-2025
Q3 Pierre-Hugues HerbertP. Herbert	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Tu vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Tu	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
60.41% (206/135)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
58.62% (459/324)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
53.23% (3951/3472)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
62.72% (143/85)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
55.56% (25/20)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
58.06% (18/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
54.05% (20/17)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.52
1639	Aces Total	1687
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
718	Total Double Faults	603
1:21:27	Average Match Time	1:31:40
371.85	Average Opponent Rank	371.13
61% (12005/19694)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
73% (8754/12005)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
52% (4000/7689)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
42% (800/1906)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
39% (7894/20224)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
42.11% (8/11)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
54.55% (6/5)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
55.56% (15/12)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
47.41% (64/71)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
75.84% (113/36)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
61% (206/336)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
0% (0/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
54% (59/110)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
55% (51/93)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
88% (198/175)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
11% (198/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
22% (143/31)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)